APT
i
Association for
Psychological Type
International
Search:
About APTi
Board of Directors
Ethics
Forms
Mission
News Archives
President's Message
Staff
Stategic Plan
APTi Store
Donate to APTi
Contact Us
Accommodations
Awards
Conference Recordings
Past Conferences
Program
Sponsors
Submissions
Join APTi
Members Page
Membership Benefits
Sign In
Contact Us
Advanced Applications
Region and Chapter Events
Training schedule
Contact Us
Chapter Guide
E-Chapter
Find a Chapter
Career & Occupations
Counseling & Psychotherapy
Education
Health and Wellness
Management & Organization Development
Multicultural & International Issues
Religion & Spirituality
Theory & Research
Special Interest Groups (SIGS)
Contact Us
Bulletin
Conference Recordings
Exercises for Differentiating MBTI® Type
How to Get Published
Journal of Psychological Type
Research
Type around the World, Newsletters
APTi Partners
CAPT
CPP
Interstrength Associates
PersonalityType.com
Qualifying.org
Type Resources
General Links
About Us
APT International Conference
Membership
Training
Regions & Chapters
Interest Areas
Publications
Partners & Links
Ethics
Ethics-Summary
Ethics-Full Text
Join APTi
Membership Benefits
Join APTi
Members Login
Username:
Password:
Need Login Help?
Ethics-Summary
APTi Ethics - Summary
A Summary of Reminders for Delivering Psychological Type Assessment Services Via Voice-to-Voice, Image-to-Image, or Email-to-Email
Setting the Contract
Be sure to clarify how you will charge your phone, web-conferencing, or email time to the Respondent.
Administering the Psychological Type Inventory
Provide written directions to the Respondent, reminding them that taking the assessment is voluntary, that type does not assess mental or emotional health, and that results are confidential and belong to the Respondent.
Provide directions for accessing the online administration website (if appropriate), be sure to include your contact information, should the Respondent experience difficulty during administration and need to contact you.
Providing Feedback
Assessment results must not be returned prior to the Respondent receiving an overview of psychological type or before having the opportunity to assess his or her Self-Estimate Type.
After the Respondent has received an explanation of psychological type and the psychological type instrument, and identified his/her Self-Estimate Type, the results may then be emailed or mailed to the Respondent.
Verifying Best-Fit Type and Exploring Applications
Additional interaction with the Professional should always occur after the Respondent has received and had the opportunity to review his/her assessment results.
This interaction should include both assisting the Respondent in identifying his/her Best-Fit Type, and also exploring ways the Respondent can apply psychological type in his/her work setting or/or life circumstances.
Example of a Typical Voice-to-Voice Assessment Process
Set the contract with the Respondent over the phone.
Email information to the Respondent regarding taking the psychological type inventory on-line.
After the Respondent has completed the assessment, download the Respondent's results to your computer. Do not send the results to the Respondent. Review the results prior to the phone interpretation session.
Conduct an initial telephone interpretation session with the Respondent to provide a brief history of type theory, to discuss preferences, to provide descriptions of the type preferences, and to have the client indicate his/her Self-Estimate Type.
Email results to Respondent.
After the Respondent has reviewed his/her results, conduct another telephone interpretation session to discuss the assessment results. Include in this conversation a discussion of best-fit type, activities to aid the Respondent in clarifying his/her type preferences, and possible applications of type.
Schedule future telephone interpretation sessions as needed.
The following articles are provided to further clarify the ethical use of psychological type instruments:
APA Ethical Principles (refer to sections 3, 4, and 9)
Person-to-Person
by Roger R. Pearman, APT Bulletin of Psychological Type, Early Spring 2002
"Person-To-Person" Interpretation Is New Minimum Standard
by Ray Zeisset, APT Bulletin of Psychological Type, Late Autumn 2002
Throwing the Baby Out With the Bathwater
by Roger R. Pearman, APT Bulletin of Psychological Type, Winter 2003
Feedback Requirements for the MBTI Instrument: Part I
by Naomi Quenk and Jeffrey Hayes, APT Bulletin of Psychological Type, Spring 2003
Feedback Requirements for the MBTI Instrument: Part II
by Naomi Quenk and Jeffrey Hayes, APT Bulletin of Psychological Type, Summer 2003
© 2010 Association for Psychological Type International.
MBTI®, Myers-Briggs®, and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Trust in the
United States
and other countries.
The Breckenridge Type Indicator™ and BTI™ are trademarks of the Breckenridge Institute®. Golden™ and Golden Personality Type Profiler™ are trademarks in the
U.S.
and/or other countries, of Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s).
Website Questions/Feedback to:
web@aptinternational.org
.
Site map
|
Disclaimer